Bayesian thinking

I’m a big fan of Bayesian reasoning, and I like the idea of applying it to human intelligence.  Usually it is in terms of failures of reasoning, compared with the gold-standard of Bayes.  That’s why I like this post from Andrew Gelman’s blog about this post from Slate where they present evidence that even very young children think in a Bayesian way.  The discussion centers around contrasting children and adults in terms of the priors they have when approaching a new problem.  Gelman makes the point that the failures in adults can also occur because out internal models tend to be discrete and the real-world is continious.  It is very interesting to see how these sorts of mappings from theory to reality are made.  In general, how do we infer what internal representations of models we are actually employing? 


About brianblais

I am a professor of Science and Technology at Bryant University in Smithfield, RI, and a research professor in the Institute for Brain and Neural Systems, Brown University. My research is in computational neuroscience and statistics. I teach physics, meteorology, astonomy, theoretical neuroscience, systems dynamics, artificial intelligence and robotics. My book, "Theory of Cortical Plasticity" (World Scientific, 2004), details a theory of learning and memory in the cortex, and presents the consequences and predictions of the theory. I am an avid python enthusiast, and a Bayesian (a la E. T. Jaynes), and love music.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Bayesian thinking

  1. Ryan Smith says:

    And on that note…enjoy!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s